| |
Blog of Adam Daifallah -- author, journalist, law student. Lover of politics, writing, golf, curling, fitness, fashion, bacon and maple products -- not necessarily (but probably) in that order. Partisan of the Anglosphere. Contact me via email at adam@daifallah.com. This summer I am joined by Keir Wilmut and Omar Soliman.
Thursday, September 30, 2004
Kerry reinforces image as a weak flip-flooper.
I'm totally astonished watching the post-debate analysis on CNN. Candy Crowley, Jeff Greenfield and others saying that Kerry managed to shake his image as a vacillating flip flopper? Please. He did not. Bush won this debate handily. Three points:
1. Kerry looked like he was speaking to the U.N. General Assembly, not the American electorate. His language was tailored to an international audience. The American people don't care about creating alliances or hosting summits with other nations about rebuilding Iraq. They care about keeping America safe. Kerry just doesn't seem to get that. He does not understand that Americans are going to vote for the guy who is going to best protect their security, not the guy who is going to forge the greatest number of alliances.
2. Bush brilliantly reinforced Kerry's constant flip-flops on Iraq. At every opportunity, Bush reminded the audience that Kerry keeps sending "mixed messages" or the "wrong signal." Bush played the patrotism card and I'm certain it will work.
3. Jim Lehrer did a poor job moderating, because he gave in too many times to the pressure to give the extra 30-second rebutall. And almost every time, Bush used that opportunity to pound Kerry on his flip-flops. Lehrer was inadvertently complicit in Bush's strong performance.
Bush was totally on message, and I'll be interested to see the post-debate polling numbers.
Permance rating:
Bush: A-
Kerry: C
# posted by Adam Daifallah : 10:33 PM
Swift Boat Vets have a new ad out...
In just a few hours...
...the first debate (I hesitate to call it that, since the format will apparently not have them engaging each other at all) of the presidential race will be on TV. Looking forward to it. I'll come back to talk about it after, but I'm fully expecting a Bush romp. Kerry is a fine debater -- indeed, he was a champion debater in high school and at Yale. But Bush has that uncanny ability to speak to the average Joe that a rich Massachussetts liberal like Kerry will never have. He connects. Kerry is weak on foreign policy, the subject of this debate. So despite certain verbal gaffes, I'll go out on a limb and predict that Bush will come out on top.
# posted by Adam Daifallah : 5:34 PM
Nestruck's leftism
Oh dear. J. Kelly Nestruck, my estimable colleague, is really letting his left flank run wild these days.
First he complained about a New York museum jacking up its admission fee from $12 to $20, because "access to great art should be a basic human right." Now he's upset about the article from Wednesday's New York Times I mentioned below.
I have many problems with Kelly's conservative-bashing analysis, but this aroused the strongest feelings:
The truth is that Canada remains very respected in the world, though mainly now because of domestic policy rather than foreign policy. Why, for example, did 43 North Koreans scale the wall to the Canadian Embassy today desperately seeking asylum? Because we are still a beacon of hope to the world, folks.
First of all, Canada is not respected in the world, insofar as other governments are concerned. We are ignored. That's because have no clout: no military and no diplomatic muscle to flex. That is why Iran ran roughshod over us in the Zahra Kazemi case, the journalist murdered while being interrogated in Iran. The mad mullahs knew full well that Canada would do nothing to retaliate for their heinous killing of our citizen.
The people in the world who hate the U.S. most -- the populations of the Middle East, Old Europe and parts of Asia -- might like Canada simply because we are not the U.S. and don't toe the American line. Do they really like us for what we are? I'm not entirely sure. But is being "not the U.S." really something to be proud of? What are we then? I don't find simply being defined based on what we're not very pleasing.
Second, the reason the North Koreans were jumping the fence at the embassy has nothing to do with us being a "beacon of hope." While I admire the romanticism of such a claim, the reason they picked us is because they know we're easy to get into. Canada has a rep throughout the world for being a refugee dumping ground. (That's one thing I'm proud of, actually. I say, bring them over! We should open up the country to as many North Koreans as possible who can escape Kim Jong Il's gulags.)
People like Bliss, Cohen and Bercuson are not desparing because the Tories lost the election. They are upset because they see Canada being left behind in the world. Canada has contributed much to international affairs over the years, and much of it we can no longer do. They do not dream of returning to some iconic past, but of creating a better Canada in the future that can at least hold its own, defend itself, and remain a sovereign nation.
# posted by Adam Daifallah : 1:27 AM
Wednesday, September 29, 2004
Canada in decline
Intriguing, yet sobering piece in today's New York Times by their level-headed Canadian correspondent, Clifford Kruass, about various Canuck thinkers who believe Canada is increasingly rudderless and in decline. Worth reading.
According to Krauss, these pessimists "see themselves as part of an informal school that has no name or single mentor, but all are writing the same assessment: Canada is in decline, or at the very least, has fallen short of their aspirations."
Quoted are such familiar names as David Bercuson, Michael Bliss (who rather drearily proclaims,"I'm in almost total despair...You have a country, but what is it for and what is it doing?''), Jack Granatstein and Andrew Cohen.
Thinkers who promote this view are often associated with the Right, although it is spreading to all corners of the spectrum.
I count myself in this school, and am constantly thinking about how to reverse current trends. Canada is similar to a frog in a kettle of slowly-warming water: it doesn't realize its dead until its too late.
I've often wondered how much sympathy this view has with everyday people, or whether most people even think about it at all. Given recent voting patterns, I suppose not much.
(Hat tip: David Mader)
# posted by Adam Daifallah : 8:01 PM
New website
Well, here it is. Hope you enjoy it. I think it's a big improvement over my amateurish old site, which I admit to having designed myself on MS Word! Thanks to the pros at Optamedia for a job well done!
# posted by Adam Daifallah : 3:00 PM
Tuesday, September 28, 2004
Why Bush is winning the women's vote
Say what you will about Naomi Wolf (liberal, feminist, New Age, etc...) but this is a very persuasive, thoughtful and original essay. The thesis is this: The Bush team has won the women's vote from the Democrats without them even knowing it. The Bushies used extremely clever and subtle image management to pursuade soccer moms that Bush isn't the scary zealot that the Democrats would have us believe. Wolf credits the genius of Bush advisor Karen Hughes, and suspects that Mike Deaver, the old Reagan hand, is at work:
While Bush Inc. is flooding women’s magazines with features in which Laura Bush gets out a family-friendly feminist message, Kerry et al. remain obsessed with sending white men out onto the Sunday talk shows—which women don’t watch. While Bush Inc. understands the power of the vivid visual image—dressing the entire GOP convention, for instance, in matching tangerine and turquoise, color-coordinating the Cheney grandchildren to give a visual sense of order and unity—the Democrats keep being bumped to the inside pages because they send out their candidate and his wife in neutrals. I am convinced that Michael Deaver is the invisible hand behind the calculated visuals of the Bush campaign—the signature use of deep, majestic backdrops behind the candidate, the use of jewel tones on Laura Bush and other women associated with the administration, the trick of forcing photographers to sit close to the stage so that they must shoot sharply upward, showing the candidate from a heroic angle. By contrast, the Democrats ignore them, losing women, who are simply too busy racing to get school lunches ready and kids out the door to get their impressions about the candidates from Meet the Press.
Now, it could be the Wolf is just bitter because she wasn't hired as a high-paid campaign consultant like she was in 2000 (she was advising Al Gore on women's issues) but it seems sincere, and her thesis is definitely credible.
# posted by Adam Daifallah : 8:48 PM
Monday, September 27, 2004
What I've been doing....
OK, sportsfans. Here's some news.
Get ready for a new www.daifallah.com -- launching in the next few days! A total (and very professional) redesign has been done by Edmonton-based Optamedia, a company I highly recommend to everyone for their web design needs! Very professional and easy to get along with people there.
And never, I repeat NEVER, use cphosting.com to host your website. They are awful.
# posted by Adam Daifallah : 4:06 PM
Celcius 41.11
Anyone out there actually seen this? Am interested to know what it's really like. Love the trailer.
# posted by Adam Daifallah : 10:51 AM
Joe Clark is alive
Joe Clark was interviewed yesterday on CTV's Question Period. Paul Tuns sums it up perfectly:
Clark...told the network's Question Period public affairs show, the two key questions for him about Martin are "Can he govern?" and "What does he want to do?" Answers: Better than Clark and about the same as Clark.
I have nothing further to add.
# posted by Adam Daifallah : 9:44 AM
Sunday, September 26, 2004
The ADQ convention
Being in attendance yesterday in Drummondville was a fantastic time; probably the most interesting and rewarding political experience I've had in a number of years. This party is unlike anything I've ever seen, and, without sounding too cliché, I really do now feel that I understand Quebec a little bit better. I won't say anything more for now: I'm still synthesizing everything, and working on an article about the convention which should be published in the next few days. (Will post it here.)
# posted by Adam Daifallah : 11:55 AM
Friday, September 24, 2004
Chalabi exonerated -- again
When will his powerful enemies finally give up and stop trying to destroy the man?
# posted by Adam Daifallah : 9:38 PM
Condoms for curlers
Good to see my favourite winter sport, curling, is diversifying its roster of sponsors. I find it intriguing that Trojan has deemed curlers to be a group worthy of marketing condoms to. Hmmmmmmmmmm.
As an aside, I'm pleased to announce that my weekly curling column will be returning to the National Post for a second season this winter.
# posted by Adam Daifallah : 2:18 PM
Politics in La Belle Province
Living in Quebec is a lot of fun. (I am here until May 2005 on fellowship.) First, Montreal is culturally very vibrant. It is superior to Toronto in many ways -- sorry to my friends there. But the politics here are really heating up, and it is fascinating watching it all take place.
First, the Parti Quebecois released a report on attitudes towards sovereignty among young people showing that support for independence is dying. The authors of the report, a gang of 3 young MNAs known as the Three Musketeers, travelled the province for a few months and came back saying the PQ is losing touch with young people. Bernard Landry, the party leader, is reportedly embracing the report. I found this surprising.
Second, Mario Dumont has come out calling for Quebec to be "automous" within Canada. This is fresh off the heels of Dumont's ADQ picking up their fifth seat in the legislature in a byelection earlier this week, and on the eve of the party's convention in Drummondville. (I will be attending and am looking forward to it immensely.) Dumont is clearly trying to put himself squarely in the middle of the Charest Liberals and the PQ, and it looks like a smart strategy.
Provincial politics here is quite lively. Its also nice to see a public discourse so focused on real ideas and policies, and not petty back-biting. I'm liking it here.
# posted by Adam Daifallah : 10:33 AM
Thursday, September 23, 2004
The CBC is a patronage dumping ground? Who knew?
A good little press release from a somewhat surprising source: Friends of Canadian Broadcasting is calling the CBC and CRTC on the fact that it is littered with political appointees of the governing party.
-- 92% of appointees [to the CBC presidency and its board] have been affiliated with the governing political party;
-- Only 21% of appointees have been women;
-- Only 3 of 152 appointees have been visible minorities or aboriginal people;
-- 83% of appointees to the CRTC were affiliated with the governing party;
-- 25% of appointees to the CRTC have been women, two appointees have been visible minorities and none have been aboriginal.
Interesting stats given all the talk from this country's literati about how the CBC is so "representative" of the Canadian reality.
# posted by Adam Daifallah : 8:58 AM
Wednesday, September 22, 2004
Urquhart is sloppy
Uncharacterisitically shoddy column today by the Toronto Star's Ian Urquhart, usually the most readable scribe in that mostly unreadable newspaper.
Urquhart uses the term "neo-conservative" liberally to describe those on the "right" in the Ontario Conservative Party. That term is a misnomer. As most are aware, neocon is an American word applied to former Communists and Leftists who gravitated to the right during the Cold War. Most are hawks on foreign policy, and support George W. Bush's policies. Neocon in the Canadian context has never been properly defined or used. A better term for these Ontario PC Party members would be "small 'c' conservatives" or "ideological conservatives."
A few comments:
Urquhart: Does the election of John Tory — a Bill Davis acolyte — as leader of the provincial Conservatives signal the death of neo-conservatism in Ontario? No, although it is certainly in retreat.
Me: Neoconservatism in Ontario was never really alive. (See above). Also note that Mike Harris left office in 2001 with the size of government bigger and social spending higher than ever -- a fact Urquhart and others rarely (never?) write about.
Urquhart: In North America, the neo-conservative cycle began with the election of Ronald Reagan in 1980.
Me: What is a "neo-conservative cycle"? Maybe he means ascention to power. Ideological conservatives had in fact wrestled control of the Republican Party away from its moderate wing in 1964, when Barry Goldwater was nominated as their candidate.
Urquhart: But the neo-cons used the time [1985-1995] to take control of the [Ontario PC] party under Mike Harris' leadership and to draft a radical platform, the Common Sense Revolution. It called for a sharp reduction in taxes, cuts to social programs (welfare) and red tape, a return to law and order, and the sell-off of government assets.
Me: Labeling the Common Sense Revolution "radical" is not analysis, it is polemics. Reducing taxes is not a radical prosition; it has been done by all parties including the Liberals and even the NDP. The Harris Tories, in the end, did not sell-off government assets -- not mentioned by Urquhart. If this was radical, I'd love to know that unradical looks like.
Urquhart: Neo-conservative Harrisites were welcomed back into [Ernie Eves'] fold and given the reins of power. In the run-up to the 2003 election, they produced a platform that called for more tax cuts, a ban on teachers' strikes, more police, a crackdown on illegal immigrants, and a scoop law for the homeless. Much of it was borrowed from Flaherty's leadership campaign platform. The voters rejected it and elected McGuinty and the Liberals.
Me: Eves was a bad campaigner and suffered from credibility problems. Those "in the know" (and likely many voters, too) could tell that Eves didn't really believe in the platform he was espousing. It was the same problem Jean Charest had in the 1997 federal election: he didn't believe what he was running on -- tax cuts, etc... The discomfort was palpable.
What Urquhart and some others erroneously assume is that Tory's centrist approach to politics (a respected colleague once convinced me of the inherent wrongess of using the term "moderate" to describe "centrist") is what voters really want. Precious little evidence exists to support that claim, yet it is advanced as though it is a fact all over the media. Ideological conservatism can win if the ideas are explained clearly and the messenger believes in the message.
# posted by Adam Daifallah : 1:27 PM
A Pulitzer for Rosett
Claudia Rosett in The Wall Street Journal is again mandatory reading. She has continued undaunted in exposing the corruption in the U.N.'s pathetic Oil-for-Food program, which enriched at once Saddam Hussein and Kofi Annan and his mandarins -- all at the expense of the lives of Iraqi babies. Rosett's reporting is what journalism awards were created for.
# posted by Adam Daifallah : 1:04 PM
New Swift Boat Veterans ad
Tuesday, September 21, 2004
Give him some respect...
Monday, September 20, 2004
On John Tory
Most of what needs to be said about John Tory's election to the leadership of the Ontario Conservative Party on Saturday has already been said. As a small 'c' conservative, Tory was obviously not my preferred choice. Tory has a long track record of hostility toward conservative values, and he doesn't have the most examplary record as a party apparatchik (Grossman '87 in Ontario; Campbell '93 federally, etc...) And where was he during the glorious early years of the Common Sense Revolution? Seems to me he was AWOL. But the party has made its choice, and it should have a decent shot at defeating Dalton McGuinty in 2007 given his disastrous first 12 months in office.
UPDATE: Signs of trouble are already visible:
The Ontario Conservatives are moving away from the right-wing politics of former premier Mike Harris because "there are different prescriptions required for different times," new leader John Tory says.
....
"We will express Conservative principles differently when the next election comes around, but the bottom line will really be to be very concise in what it is we're going to do and then to get into government and do it," the former Rogers Cable president and CEO said in an interview on CTV's Question Period.
....
Federal deputy Conservative leader Peter MacKay, who chatted with Tory at the Front St. taping of Question Period, said his victory "signals a shift in the mindset within the party."
"This is clearly the centrist, pragmatic approach that the federal party has to emulate as well," MacKay said of Tory, the former principal secretary to premier William Davis.
You'd think that after Larry Grossman, Kim Campbell, Jean Charest, and Ernie Eves the Tories would realize the failure of this strategy. Guess not.
# posted by Adam Daifallah : 8:54 AM
Thursday, September 16, 2004
Since when is swearing a crime?
So Mike Harris apparently cussed during the advanced poll for the Ontario Conservative party leadership election:
Harris has been given until next Monday to apologize or face possible expulsion from the Vaughan-King-Aurora Conservative Riding Association. He also faces a lawsuit launched by riding president Gabe Spoletini.
"It was the kind of language you would expect from a sailor, not a former premier," Spoletini said. Spoletini said the incident occurred Monday when Harris, who lives in Woodbridge with his girlfriend Laura Maguire, became irate over being asked for the required two pieces of identification at the advance poll, including one that showed his address and signature.
"I heard yelling ... and I heard him say `Just give me the f------ ballot' and then he grabbed it from the woman who was the DRO (the deputy returning officer)," Spoletini said.
"I said, `What's going on here?' He turned around and said, `You can challenge my f------ ballot, you jackass.' I said, `Don't be an a------' and he said to me `You're the biggest a------ of them all.'"
This story is ridiculous. According to a Harris spokesperson, he was actually asked for a 3rd piece of ID, which is why he got upset. Why the former Premier of the province is being asked for extra ID is beyond me. I'd be inclined to believe Harris. Mr. Spoletini, the riding president, doesn't exactly have a stellar track record.
# posted by Adam Daifallah : 11:37 AM
Monday, September 13, 2004
Toronto Star for Tory
Saturday, September 11, 2004
Meet Emmanuelle Richez
Today's edition of La Presse, Quebec's most influential daily, contains a nice profile of my girlfriend Emma in their special supplement on Qubecers in the 18-24 age group. Check it out. I am very proud of her!
# posted by Adam Daifallah : 6:11 PM
Friday, September 10, 2004
Stop the genocide
Very good piece here by Nina Shea of Freedom House about the catastrophic situation in Sudan and the need for Western action. Colin Powell, the state secretary, has termed the murderous campaign in that country's Darfur region "genocide," a hugely important step in getting this matter addressed -- and hopefully, redressed -- at the United Nations.
# posted by Adam Daifallah : 9:29 AM
Big Media is Lazy
David Mader is closely following developments on the supposedly incriminating documents on Bush's Natioanl Guard service. A few bloggers have done great work on this file, and may have exposed this entire story as a huge hoax that the mainstream press fell for.
# posted by Adam Daifallah : 8:31 AM
Thursday, September 09, 2004
Al Gore, doing his part to save the environment
The latest edition of the New Yorker contains a particularly interesting (although overly charitable, and very long) profile of former Vice President Al Gore by the magazine's editor, David Remnick. The piece is brilliantly written and worth your while.
But this little snippet caught my eye, in a section describing the Gore's new home in Nashville:
When the architect was designing the rear addition to the house, Gore asked him to curve the walls inward in two places in order to save several trees. “The trees weren’t anything special, nothing rare or anything,” he said. “I just couldn’t bear to bring ’em down.” In the back yard, around the patio and the extra-long pool, where Al and Tipper do laps, Gore also installed an anti-bug system that sprays a fine mist of ground chrysanthemums from various discreet sources: a tree trunk, a patio wall. “The mosquitoes just hate it,” he said. Other features of the house are less environmentally correct. A 2004 black Cadillac, which Gore drives, was parked in the driveway. A ’65 Mustang—a Valentine’s Day gift from Al to Tipper—was parked in the garage.
Nice to see Doomsday Al, who once prophesized the end of the world would come in what, 2010?, driving a gas-guzzling Cadillac (!!!!!!!). I suppose Gore thinks that ideas like keeping to one car per household and driving puny hybrids should apply to everyone but himself.
# posted by Adam Daifallah : 1:42 AM
Oppo 101
Tuesday, September 07, 2004
Moe Norman, RIP.
Credit: CBC.ca
Thanks to a call from my awesome news-loving mom, who has always voluntarily and selflessly acted as a second set of eyes and ears, I learned today of the death over the weekend of Canadian golf legend Moe Norman. (I missed the news because we had no contact with civilization during the canoe trip.)
This is very sad for the Canadian golf world. Ever since I started playing golf I have been very intrigued by the enigmatic story of Moe Norman. He is probably not well-known to most readers here, but Norman is thought by some to be the greatest ball striker ever born. He did not achieve tremendous fame and success in professional golf because of his strange and often erratic personality and behaviour. (Most people think this was the result of being run over by a train when he was young; some think he was an "idiot savant" because he had an uncanny ability to recite complex mathematical equations.) Norman would often sleep in his car, had bad personal hygiene, drank Coke from dusk till dawn, repeated himself while talking, etc... He was a very quirky man indeed.
But later in life he enjoyed a sort of renaissance, when he made the cover of Golf Digest magazine, a book was written about him, and he became involved in a new wave teaching method based on his unorthodox swing, Natural Golf. He was also -- much belatedly -- inducted into the Canadian Golf Hall of Fame. After struggling financially for most of his life, he was also given a $5,000/month contract from Titleist golf balls.
I was fortunate enough to see Norman in action twice: once at a junior golf tournament at Horseshoe Valley in 1997; the other at a clinic he did for the public near Peterborough a year or two later. He was already in his late 60s by then, but wow, could he still hit the ball. Dead straight every time. I remember being so excited to finally be seeing this man play in the flesh. It was one of the highlights of my junior golf career.
I was not disappointed. I recall Norman being very conversant with the crowd, talking aloud as he hit the ball. "So pure, so pure," he said, or something to that effect, after striking perfect shot after perfect shot. "Nobody can touch me, nobody can touch me." Norman was a truly fascinating character and he will be missed.
UPDATE: See Lorne Rubenstein's characteristically excellent pieces in the Globe here and here.
# posted by Adam Daifallah : 5:55 PM
Kerry will be crushed
Terrific column this morning by Brendan Miniter of The Wall Street Journal on why George W. Bush will beat John Kerry. For quite a while now, I've been saying this election will be a repeat of the '88 presidential campaign -- Bush I vs. Michael Dukakis. Many people disagree with this parallel, but it's looking more and more similar everyday. Kerry is being masterfully defined by his opponent as weak on security, wrong on taxes, unprincipled, etc... (Karl Rove learned this art from the late great Lee Atwater.)
Except for the notable exception of the people around Bill Clinton, the U.S. Democrats are basically the same as the Conservative Party in Canada. They can't compete on a political strategy level. They get outmanoeuvred every time. This election is turning out to be no exception.
# posted by Adam Daifallah : 10:08 AM
Monday, September 06, 2004
Why I didn't blog this weekend
The Sauve Scholars program, which I'm a part of for the next 8 months, went on a canoe trip in Northern Quebec (Lac des Sept Freres) for three days.
It was a great time. For many, it was their first time canoeing. Everybody really enjoyed it. The canoe trippers that accompanied us from a company called Paddlefoot were first rate and really professional. Here's some of the crew:
# posted by Adam Daifallah : 11:18 PM
Friday, September 03, 2004
The Republican National Convention
It's over now, and what a week it was. I think RNC2004 will go down as one of the best national political conventions of our time. Professional, lively, powerful messaging, fun-looking: the show at Madison Square Garden had it all. A number of lessons can be taken away from this and applied to Canadian politics:
1. Professionalism is everything. If you run a good show, it just looks so much better. Just spend the money! Canadian political conventions are still rather rinky-dink, and could use some help from the consultant types who put together this event.
2. Controversial speeches are fun, effective, and make for great TV. Sen. Zell Miller's speech was panned by the media's bien-pensants, but I think it was remarkably well-done. (Indeed, having the mainstream pundits bash the speech as overly "negative" or "angry" was probably part of the Republican game plan.) Miller strayed from the boilerplate and passionately ripped into John Kerry. Thus, it made big news and generated tons of buzz. Why can't anyone muster the courage to do that here? It just doesn't seem to be in our political blood.
3. Don't equivocate or back down from decisions perceived to be unpopular. Canadian politicians, especially of the Conservative variety, should heed the Republican example on the war in Iraq. Even I was surprised a bit at the vociferous and robust defense of the drive to war and decision to invade. Even now, after the war's plummeted popularity, Bush and his surrogates are publicly sticking by that decision. That is real leadership. Here, too many politicians buckle at the moment a policy appears to be losing favour with the public. Mike Harris realized the error in that strategy, and he was rewarded. Others should too, but for some reason don't.
4. Present a vision. Bush's speech outlining his ideas for a second term presented not just a laundry list of disconnected policies, he put forward a real vision with underlying principles guiding that plan: Winning the war on terrorism, more freedom abroad and at more freedom home. Evoking such Big Ideas can help win elections; they are certainly more effective than piecemeal platform documents with little cohesiveness or overaching themes. Big, bold ideas work; tinkering here and there with the status quo is boring.
# posted by Adam Daifallah : 1:46 PM
Wednesday, September 01, 2004
Kerry on Iraq
If this isn't innovative electioneering and clever fundraising, I don't know what is.
Boy, the Americans are just so much better at this. Watch the video.
# posted by Adam Daifallah : 12:38 PM
|
