Hogline
sensors 'long overdue'
Innovation
takes human error out of officiating the game
Adam
Daifallah
National
Post
Why
do the rocks have silver handles?
That's
the question I was asking myself after flipping on the TV to watch curling's
recent Continental Cup. Normally the handles are the same colour as the rest of
the rock. Later in the broadcast it was explained that these handles are part
of a new state-of-the-art hogline violation detection system being used for the
first time in competition.
The
concept is simple. A magnetic strip is placed underneath the ice surface, and
the rocks are equipped with special sensors in the handle. Each handle has two
red and two green lights on it. If the player released the rock before the
hogline, the green lights flash and then remain solid green for the trip down
the ice. If the rock is not released in time and is "hogged," the red
lights go on, and the rock must be pulled.
The
new technology was created by Startco Engineering Ltd., a Saskatoon-based firm.
According to its president, Garry Paulson, the idea for the detectors were
first created by a group of
The
Canadian Curling Association has been supportive of the product -- which
received positive reviews from Canadian champions Randy Ferbey and Colleen
Jones after its Continental Cup test run -- and is planning on using it at all
national championships this year.
"I
loved [the sensors] and I think they worked really well," Jones said
yesterday. "It's something that's long overdue for the game. There's
always the possibility for human error when it comes to hogline judging. It
really worked very well."
Neil
Houston, the CCA's manager of championship services, said the reaction was
"100% positive" from the players at the Cup. And Paulson says the
technology is "100% accurate."
Elite
curlers have in the past complained about the old system of hogline judging,
when CCA officials would sit on the line and pull rocks at will.
Accusations
of bias were frequent, and rocks were sometimes pulled at critical junctures in
games that led players to question the system. In defence of the judges, it was
difficult to monitor multiple sheets at once, which they were required to do,
and brooms and legs often blocked the line of sight.
"Bad
hogline calls have cost people games. I think I trust the machines a lot more
than human judgment," Jones said.
Even
Ed Werenich, who has sparred endlessly with the CCA over the years, is
supportive of the move because of all the bad experiences with judges.
"We've
got to get the officials out of the game," Werenich said. "It can't
be any worse than the system they've been using. You've gotta get those
freeloading blind mice off the hogline. Everybody knows it’s just a party for them.
You can't take them seriously with their track record."
Werenich
recalled an incident at the 1974 Brier in
"He
must have radioed down, because it was after the end was complete. I was ready
to go up in the stands and take some shots at him with my rink rat,"
Werenich said with his trademark chuckle.
Not
everyone seems to be happy about the new technology, however.
"Let's
be realistic. Implementing it four months after first use [in high-calibre
competition] ... you could be asking for trouble. All hell could break
loose," Martin told the
The
cost isn't cheap, however. The devices cost $650 per rock, or about $10,000 for
a set of 16 for one sheet. For more information check out www.eyeonthehog.ca.
© National Post 2003